Read up
Marketing insights that don't waste your time
Practical guides on AI, automation, and getting more out of your marketing workflow.
All articles
Claude Cowork vs Claude Code: Which Surface a Marketing Team Should Open
Two surfaces run the same agentic engine, and only one of them can reach the folder your brief is already sitting in. That gap is the whole decision, and it is not the one the internet is arguing about. In September, Anthropic quietly deleted half of the confusion around it by merging Cowork and chat into a single product, then left the expensive half exactly where it was. If your team is still choosing between Chat and Cowork before typing, you are resolving a question the vendor closed on September 16, 2026. So which surface should carry the deck you owe on Thursday? Get it wrong and you do not lose five minutes, you lose the afternoon, because the surface you picked could not reach the files. The rule that replaces all of it takes one question to apply, and it is the one you have not been asking.
Martin J.CompareOct 2, 2026Midjourney Pricing in 2026: What a Marketing Team Actually Pays
Your Midjourney invoice has said the same number for months and you still cannot say what it bought. The plan sells fast GPU hours, your campaign plan is written in delivered assets, and nothing on the pricing page translates one into the other. So is Standard genuinely the tier for the volume you run? Basic charges $3.03 for a bundled hour that every plan above it sells for $2.00.
Martin J.CompareOct 2, 2026Claude Cowork Pricing in 2026: Which Plan You Actually Need
One number is circulating for Claude Cowork, and it is $100. It is not wrong, which is what makes it useless: it names one rung of a ladder that starts at $20. So here is the honest version: Cowork has no subscription of its own, your existing Claude plan already includes it, and the thing that decides your cost is not the tier label. It is how fast your multi-step tasks eat through a shared usage pool that nobody publishes as a number. Which plan are you on right now, and how much of it is your agentic work quietly consuming every week?
Martin J.CompareOct 2, 2026Best ChatGPT Prompts for Marketing in 2026: 40 That Survive a Workflow
Ask twenty marketers for their best ChatGPT prompts and you will get twenty screenshots, none of which include the input. The prompts that survived a real campaign all had the same five parts, and one of them is the part almost nobody publishes.
Martin J.CompareOct 1, 2026
The marketing AI workspace that actually does the work.
On Page SEO Services: What the Deliverable Actually Looks Like
Every on page SEO services proposal promises the same activities. None says what finished work looks like. Could you tell if none of it happened?
Martin J.CompareOct 1, 2026Claude API Pricing 2026: What You Actually Pay Per Token
Somewhere in your procurement notes there is a Claude number you wrote down weeks ago. It is probably wrong, and not because anyone lied to you. The pages ranking for this query quote Sonnet 4, Haiku 3.5, Claude 3 Opus and Opus 4.6 at $15 input and $75 output. Six of the ten name a model Anthropic has already retired or superseded. The freshest one, published September 18, 2026, builds its entire break-even calculation on Sonnet 4 at $3 and $15 per million tokens, a generation that is no longer in the current line-up. So which rate is your budget actually built on? You already committed to an answer, whether you checked it or not. Which means the cost of a marketing team's Claude usage is either four dollars a month or forty, depending on a model name most guides get wrong. Both numbers are correct. Only one of them is yours.
Martin J.CompareOct 1, 2026Claude Code vs Cursor: What Marketing Teams Actually Need
A developer in a demo shipped a landing page in a weekend, and now these two tools are on your to-evaluate list. Claude Code and Cursor are both good at what they were built for. Neither was built for your job. So which one should a marketing team pay for? For most teams, neither one.
Martin J.CompareOct 1, 2026Martech Stack in 2026: How to Build One Without Buying Twelve Tools
You did not decide to run twelve tools. You decided to solve twelve problems, one at a time, usually on a Tuesday, usually because something was already late. Nobody signed off on the whole thing, and nobody could hand you the total today without opening a spreadsheet. It just accumulated, and now the renewal calendar reads like a subscription audit you have been avoiding for two quarters. So here is the question worth sitting with: if you rebuilt your marketing stack from scratch this week, with the same budget and the same team, how much of it would you keep? Ask a marketing lead to write that list down and the answer gets noticeably less confident around the fourth line. Not because the tools are bad. Because most of them were never chosen, and the person who could have chosen them was too busy running them.
Martin J.CompareSep 30, 2026
Your competitors are already using AllAble. Are you?
The marketers pulling ahead aren't working harder. They're just working with one tool that does everything — that tool is AllAble. Try it yourself!